Thomas,
it still looks very pure with full method.
The sensors are 200 meters away from each other.
Thanks,
Sebastien
2014-05-15 15:58 GMT+02:00 Thomas Lecocq <thomas.lecocq(a)oma.be>be>:
Sebastien,
Try to do the obspy plot with st.plot(method='full') to see all features.
it indeed looks very pure...
Maybe because you are only correlating electronic noise at >10 Hz... ?
What is the distance between your sensors ?
Thomas
Le 15 May 2014 15:31:21, Sébastien Carniato a écrit :
> Thomas,
> here are the plots.
> Sebastien.
>
>
> 2014-05-15 14:49 GMT+02:00 Thomas Lecocq <thomas.lecocq(a)oma.be>be>:
>
> Sébastien,
>>
>> Could you attach the plots to the email, not 'inline', they did not
get
>> here.
>>
>> could you also join a screenshot of the data_availability table to be
>> sure?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> Le 15 May 2014 13:35:56, Sébastien Carniato a écrit :
>>
>> Thomas,
>>>
>>> It works with that config, but with that filter, I get once again a
>>> symmetric wave (like the one I put in my previous email)… The only
>>> change
>>> is the average amplitude, which is around -2.4e-11.
>>> It does look like an autocorrelation. But why ?
>>>
>>> Sébastien.
>>> On 15 mai 2014, at 12:38, Thomas Lecocq <thomas.lecocq(a)oma.be> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MSNoise mailing list
>>> MSNoise(a)mailman-as.oma.be
>>>
http://mailman-as.oma.be/mailman/listinfo/msnoise
>>>
>>